08/07/10
By Andrew Holt
The Charity Commission is today providing an update on its work in relation to charities demonstrating and reporting on the benefit they bring to the public, as set out in the Charities Act 2006.
The update relates to two areas of work: the publication today of four assessments of arts charities; and completion of the work in connection to assessments into the public benefit of 12 charities conducted in 2009, including charities advancing religion, independent charitable schools and charitable care homes.
The purpose of conducting assessments into the public benefit of a selection of charities is to provide real examples for the rest of the charity sector, to help in their awareness and understanding of public benefit, alongside the published guidance the Commission has already published.
Research by FDS International shows that three quarters (76%) of charity trustees say that they know about the public benefit requirement and nearly a quarter of trustees (22%) who are aware of the requirement say their charity has revisited its aims as a result.
On arts charities, four reports into the public benefit of arts charities are published. The charities are:
· The Royal Opera House Covent Garden
· The Young Concert Artists Trust
· The Castle Players
· Gwent Ballet Theatre, known as the Independent Ballet Wales
The Commission found that all four charities that were assessed are being administered for public benefit.
The full reports for the four charities can be found on the Commission’s website.
The assessments help to demonstrate that the public benefit principles are flexible enough to apply to four very different arts charities in terms of profile, size and operation, yet clear enough to distinguish them from organisations which are not charities.
The report then looks at independent charitable schools and charitable care homes.
In July 2009, the Commission found that eight of the twelve charities assessed, including charities advancing religion, independent charitable schools and charitable care homes, were being administered for public benefit, and four were not.
These were made up of two care homes and two independent schools. The four charities agreed to work on plans for how they intended to address the concerns raised.
All four charities have developed and submitted plans, each of which reflects the circumstances of the charity and the flexibility of approach available to charities in demonstrating public benefit.
Summaries of these plans are published on the Commissions’ website today.
All the charities have been given sufficient time to implement those plans, with up to five years where necessary.
The plans for the two schools (S. Anselm’s School Trust Limited and Highfield Priory School Limited, used a mix of new or additional bursary assistance financed by fundraising, together with the educational benefits they provide in the local community.
Neither school plans to increase its fees as part of these changes.
The Commission took into account the totality of benefits provided, including work with local communities and state schools as well as bursaries.
It concluded that these charities had addressed the findings of the Commission’s public benefit assessments published in July 2009 and that the trustees are carrying out their duty to administer the two charities for public benefit.
The Commission has also agreed that the trustees of Penylan House, Jewish Retirement and Nursing Home have addressed the original findings by developing a clear strategy for providing and publicising the assistance it offers to those who could not otherwise afford to use its services.
The fourth charity, The Rest Bay Convalescent Hotel, faced some significant challenges and is continuing to work on its plan, having been given a four month extension to complete it.
Dame Suzi Leather, chair of the Charity Commission, said: “Charities play a vital role in society, and showing how they benefit the public is an essential part of that. We have consistently said that most charities can demonstrate sufficiently how they benefit the public, and the arts charities, schools and care homes we have worked with have proved this.
"All the charities took a constructive and imaginative approach and I particularly want to recognise their hard work and goodwill.
“The arts charities have shown how they are accessible to a wide range of people, which confirms their uniqueness as charities. The plans that the schools and care homes have put in place underline very clearly that we take into account all the ways in which charities can fulfil their aims for the public benefit. We have every reason to be confident in their commitment to putting these plans into place.”
The Charity Commission now plans to review a small number of sports and recreation charities.
This will complete its programme of public benefit assessments.
The summary plans and reports are available here
Other stories you may find of interest:
2010 Budget: cautiously positive from the sector
The chancellor's 2010 Budget received a cautiously positive response from the sector. The Government announced in the 2010 Budget Report that following a judgement by the European Court of Justice in January 2009, UK charity tax relief's will be extended to charities and Community Amateur Sports Clubs in the EU and in the European Economic Area countries of Norway and Iceland. In his Budget, the chancellor also announced the budget deficit had gone down from £178bn to £163bn, and cut growth forecasts. On public spending, he announced £5 billion in savings
Sector unease at Emergency Budget
The sector has revealed its unease at the Con-Lib Coalition's Emergency Budget. Acevo chief executive Stephen Bubb has highlighted how the most vulnerable will be worst hit by the Emergency Budget and the Charity Tax Group has warned that the increase in the standard rate of VAT from 17.5% to 20% from 4 January 2011 will increase the ax burden of charities by at least £150 million per year. Urban Forum chief executive, Toby Blume, warned the Coalition Government’s emergency budget will hit poorer people hardest, and will place “tremendous strain” on services provided by charities and community groups.
NHS reforms broadly welcomed by sector
Ambitious plans set out by secretary of state for Health Andrew Lansley to reform the NHS during this Parliament and for the long-term, have been broadly welcomed by the sector. The White Paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, details how power will be devolved from Whitehall to patients and professionals. Professionals will be free to focus on improving health outcomes so that these are amongst the best in the world. Improving the quality of care will become the main purpose of the NHS. Patients will get more choice and control, backed by an information revolution, so that services are more responsive to patients and designed around them, rather than patients having to fit around services. The principle will be "no decisions about me without me".
